Jeremy Kyle fans were entertained after the TV presenter stole a studio guest’s mobility scooter during a debate and took it for a spin around the TV studio.
Seemingly exasperated at an argument breaking out over a “sleazy” 70-year-old who was “trying to seduce” another man’s wife, Jeremy Kyle started fiddling with the mobility scooter which was to the side of the stage. While two guests rowed between themselves, Jeremy Kyle alighted the mobility scooter and started playing with the controls and drove on an excursion around the studio corridors.
The mobility scooter belonged to John, 70, (left) who was alleged to have been trying to seduce Tony’s (right), 51, wife. Accidentally putting the mobility scooter in reverse, Jeremy Kyle was driven backwards at first, before working out how to use the controls.
Jeremy Kyle then sat down on the mobility scooter and started flying around the studio and down the hallways backstage, completely ignoring the two men’s dispute. Unperturbed by Jeremy Kyle’s actions, the two men carried on with their bickering as if nothing was happening with the playful host.
Fans soon took to Twitter, calling it the best thing they’d watched on daytime TV. One said: “Jeremy Kyle riding around the studio on a guest’s mobility scooter whilst they argue is the best thing I’ve seen all week.” Another commented: “He’ll be in the next fast and furious film with that mobility scooter #jeremykyle.”
A mobility scooter driver has caused £3,500 worth of damage to an amusement arcade after crashing into a machine.
The woman was caught on CCTV at the Happidrome Arcade, in Marine Parade, Southend, causing the damage and then riding off laughing. It is unclear if the incident was intentional.
Owner of the arcade, Martin Richardson, is calling on residents to help identify the woman, who had a child and a dog with her at the time. He has reported the incident, which happened four weeks ago, to the police. Mr Richardson decided to release the images after the woman have a false address He is pursuing charges for criminal damage. Mr Richardson said: “What happened was along came this woman on a mobility scooter.
Martin Richardson explained: “The mobility scooter was massive. She crashed into the side of one of the machines. She drove forwards and back and seemed to think it was funny.”
Staff approached the mobility scooter driver and informed her she had caused a lot of damage to the machine so they would need to take contact details for her. However, when the police visited the address, they discovered she had given false details.
Mr Richardson continued: “It is the audacity of her to give false details. She has also caused some other poor woman distress when they had the police knocking on the door accusing them of doing this. This isn’t a witch hunt – I don’t want anyone finding her and knocking over her scooter. I just want to identify her.”
He added: “The poor police have a lot to deal with, so we want to help them out and carry out our own investigation. We want to bring charges for criminal damage.”
He added that the machine was an old model and so couldn’t be repaired, but a replacement would be about £3,500. Buying the modern equivalent would cost about £5,000.
It is not a legal requirement for mobility scooters to have insurance unless they are driven on the road. Mr Richardson said they were welcome in the arcade, as long as users were careful of children using the venue.
Newbury Town Council is set to launch a clampdown on mobility scooter drivers who speed in the town centre.
The council has received complaints about the number of mobility scooters speeding around pedestrians in the busy shopping streets of Newbury, prompting councillors to approve an awareness campaign.
The Share the Space campaign, which will also target cyclists, aims to highlight the dangers of driving mobility scooters too quickly and urges users to select the tortoise setting on their mobility scooter.
Proposals to go ahead with the campaign, which will include the printing and delivering of 5,000 campaign leaflets, have been approved by Newbury Town Council’s planning and highways department. The leaflets state: “Newbury town offers an easy, friendly and accessible welcome to people using mobility equipment and the town’s businesses value their custom. We do receive complaints that some users drive their scooters too quickly in and amongst pedestrians in the town. If you are easily overtaking pedestrians you are going too fast.”
The leaflets go on to ask users not to “dart out of shop doorways, alleyways and lanes” and to keep their speed controller to the low or tortoise setting.
Working group chairwoman, Jo Day, explained: “Occasionally mobility scooters do go too fast. I’ve nearly been mowed down by one, so we thought we would just ask everybody, mobility scooters and cyclists, to slow down a bit. Most are responsible, but like everything else there is a minority.”
A disabled man was banned from his local Post Office after staff told him his mobility scooter was not allowed entry.
Raymond Brown, 47, claimed two women in the Glasgow West Nile Street branch said only three-wheeled vehicles were permitted.
When he explained his four-wheeled scooter was a pavement model it made no difference. Raymond, who has had spina bifida since birth and cannot walk, said: “I was very angry and upset.”
He continued: “I was tempted to leave my scooter outside in the street and crawl in on my hands and knees at lunchtime just to make a point.”
A member of staff immediately offered him assistance, but then informed him his mobility scooter breached regulations. By the time Raymond reached the self-service checkout, a second member of staff appeared and reiterated the branch’s position. He was informed that it was a health and safety issue and the guidelines had been drafted by head office.
Raymond added: “They said I wasn’t allowed in the store because it was a four-wheeled mobility scooter. I was effectively banned. Wherever I go, people accommodate me, from Morrisons to House of Fraser. It is the only shop in Glasgow that has banned me.”
Raymond concluded: “Discrimination is not acceptable. I am doing this in support of all disabled people and hopefully my experience will force a review of this policy.”
The Post Office said its policy had been put in place following a number of ‘near misses’. A spokeswoman commented: “We were sorry to hear of the customer’s concerns regarding the service provided at our branch in West Nile Street. The branch team were correct to suggest that there are limitations on the types of mobility scooters which can enter the counter areas of our branches. Unfortunately, there have been a number of incidents and near misses in some branches.”
Marlborough District Council staff are encouraging mobility scooter users to plug in and recharge using town centre power points.
Although mobility scooter users can boost their batteries using several power points within the town, the recharge areas are not being widely used.
Blenheim councillor Jenny Andrews says the recharge points were installed to help make life easier for those people relying on mobility scooters to get around. She explains: “Not everyone is aware about the charge area though it does have some regular users. Most people get into the habit of charging their mobility scooters once a day and town is a great place to be able to do that. The mobility scooters are a life line really and truly help with people’s independence. All the charge areas are at places which make good gathering points and people can come along and charge their mobility scooters while they go and have a coffee with a friend for example. It’s about the social aspect of it too.”
Blenheim has a estimated 500 mobility scooter users. Jenny says Marlborough is “ideally suited” to mobility scooter users: “It’s such a flat area and as time progresses there will be more people needing to use them and we want to make that as easy as possible.”
An 80-year-old disabled woman says she has been left housebound after a cost-cutting council was forced to cancel its mobility scooter rental scheme.
Gravesham council used to offer scooters at tourism hub Towncentric in St George’s Square, Gravesend. It was moved as part of a council economy drive last year, along with the rental service, to Gravesend Borough Market.
But with her mobility scooter having recently broken and the council unable to spend the cash needed to fix it, users like Rosemary White are now unable to get into town. She explained: “I used to get the taxi into town, which was £10 each way and get transferred onto the mobility scooter, but I didn’t mind paying because I wanted to get out of my house. Now I am stuck on my own indoors. My family is in Australia, my husband died eight years ago, so there’s no one to help me. I can’t have a scooter here at home because the garage is right at the end of the road, there’s no dropped kerb, and it’s too heavy for me to lift.”
If a solution is not found, Mrs White says she will be not be able to leave her home in Lorton Close, Gravesend. Wayne Busbridge, vice chairman of Gravesham Access Group that works to promote access for all, described the end of the scheme as “disgusting”. He commented: “It’s poor for the town because it’s going to lose revenue from people that would go shopping in the town but needed a bit of help. We have already got problems with accessibility into shops and other places. This is badly cutting on the few that can’t fight back. The work going on with this transport quarter round by the station means we have already lost disabled parking bays.”
Mr Busbridge said he would be raising the group’s concerns with the council, which has been implementing a number of spending cuts in recent months. A spokesman for Gravesham council said it “was not viable” to continue the scooter scheme because not enough people were using it before the last one broke. He commented: “The number of users of the scooter scheme has reduced significantly in recent years, and since January this year it has only been used by two people. The mobility scooter has recently developed a fault and is currently out of use. We recognise that this service was valued by those that used it, but at present it is not viable to get it fixed and put resources in place for it to be reinstated. However, we are currently in discussion with local partners to see whether others are better placed to develop a scheme.”
According to Luton Today, a new website has been launched by the National Federation of Shopmobility to help recover stolen or abandoned mobility scooters and reunite them with their owners.
The National Mobility Registration Scheme was originally piloted in Littlehampton but it soon became clear that there was a national need for such a campaign. Spokesman Steve Perry explained: “We were amazed by 2015 police statistics which showed that out of 517 mobility scooters stolen, with an estimated value of £615,000, only 22% were recovered. He continued: “We understand the devastation and loss of independence this can cause.”
Luton Shopmobility manager Jayne Harris commented: “We’re pleased to support the scheme by helping clients register at the shop from 9am to midday, Monday to Friday. If you register online, please use our code LU01 which in turn will help to support us.”
It costs £12 annually and proceeds will be donated to National Federation of Shopmobility members.
A pensioner who spent the remainder of her savings on a mobility scooter in order to “keep her independence” has been prevented from using it by a train company.
Gillian Cockburn, who lives in Redcar, says travelling by train is the only way she can visit her sick husband, who is currently in the James Cook Hospital in Middlesbrough. The 70-year-old usually travels from Redcar East station to Middlesbrough Central, but last Saturday morning, a Northern Rail staff member said she could not take the mobility scooter on board the train.
The rail company confirmed it doesn’t allow any type of mobility scooter on their services due to their “restricted manoeuvrability and stability – unless they can be folded up and carried on board as a piece of luggage. Mrs Cockburn, who describes herself as “severely disabled” says that while she might manage to fold up her mobility scooter, with some difficulty, she is physically unable to lift it on and off the train. She says the ruling means she is unable to visit her husband, who suffers from vascular dementia, on his birthday.
Gillian Cockburn explained: “I have travelled to the Midlands to visit my daughter using this mobility scooter and I have never had any problems. I am severely disabled and I have to rely on public transport to travel around – I don’t understand why this train company is any different. The alternative they have suggested is using a manual wheelchair, but that would take up more space and be harder to get on the train. If the mobility scooter was just lifted on, they wouldn’t have to use the ramps, and it would be so much easier and save so much time.”
A spokesperson for Northern Rail said: “As we operate several different types of trains and our services call at more than 500 stations with a variety of platform heights, this can cause safety issues when driving a mobility scooter on or off a train with a low platform. Unfortunately, the trains we operate were built before the introduction of mobility scooters and were therefore not designed with them in mind.”
The spokesman added: “However, we will continue to listen to customers to help inform future developments in our train fleet. We are always open to listening to our customers’ needs and requirements and are working towards improving accessibility for all.”
A pensioner ‘stinking of booze’ driving a mobility scooter when he drove down the middle of the road and unleashed a tirade of abuse at a driver who tried to pass him.
The exasperated motorist says he encountered the elderly man trundling down a road in Southport, and claims he smelt ‘like he had been drinking for days.’ Video footage shows the old man slow down in the road, which the driver believes was deliberately to ‘annoy’ him, before repeatedly sticking up his middle finger.
The driver, who did not wish to be identified, claims that the mobility scooter rider also subjected him to a barrage of expletives and appeared to be drunk. The anonymous driver explained: “I was driving along and he just started slowing right down. You can see his brake light come on in the video. I couldn’t tell what he was doing. When he saw me in his mirror he started to slow down.”
He continued: “I was in a bit of a rush – I had my wife and two-year-old son on board – and when he put the brakes on that was when I wound my window down and asked him to move. That was when the smell of alcohol hit me. He smelled like he’d been drinking for days.”
The stunned driver says he had to repress his anger as the mobility scooter rider continued to block his path and swear at him. He claims that he had to resort to manoeuvring around the mobility scooter to progress with his journey, as the pensioner refused to move.
The Southport-based motorist added: “I was shocked. I see a lot of things on the road. But I’ve never seen anybody on a mobility scooter driving on the road like that. I felt angry. In my opinion it’s still drink driving as well. It’s not right. Even if it’s a mobility scooter, surely that’s against the law too?”
The driver also claimed that mobility scooters can pose a big threat on the roads, with both drivers and the mobility scooter user themselves at risk. He commented further: ‘These mobility scooters aren’t safe. Some of these scooters can go really fast as well. I don’t think they should be allowed on the roads. It’s dangerous for them as well, they aren’t protected at all. If they are on the roads and aren’t insured too and there’s an accident, then it falls on the other driver’s insurance.”
As a result of intelligence from the community, Derbyshire PC Mark Atterbury from the Chaddesden Safer Neighbourhood Team has been to visit the 83 year-old local man seen riding his mobility scooter on a dual carriageway in Derby city centre ( reported in n earlier blog article ).
PC Atterbury explained: “The man had a stroke a couple of years ago and uses the mobility scooter to remain active and to get out and about. Unfortunately he had been given some incorrect information about where and when he could use it that caused him to be on a road that was very unsafe for a vehicle of that type.”
He continued: “Thankfully with the information we received I have been able to pay him a visit and give him the correct advice that means he will now be able to use his scooter in a safer fashion.”
PC Atterbury added: “He wanted me to apologise to any of the other road users who had been concerned about his actions but is now pleased to have had the correct information.”
Derbyshire Constabulary outlined this advice to any mobility scooter users:
- You don’t need a licence to drive a mobility scooter
- Mobility scooters come in two categories – Class 2 and Class 3 invalid carriages
- Class 2 – Have a maximum speed of 4 mph and can’t be used on a road unless there is no pavement.
- Class 3 – Have a maximum speed of 8 mph, need to be registered, you need to be over 14 to drive one and has a set of required features including indicators, horn and rear view mirror
- Only a Class 3 can be driven on the road and we really wouldn’t recommend their use on very busy roads. Even these mustn’t be used in bus lanes, ‘cycle only’ lanes or motorways. Again we would not recommend the use on dual carriageways but if a Class 3 is driven on a dual carriageway you must use an amber flashing light.
- And of course if you do use a mobility scooter on a road you must follow the Highway Code.